Motilal Oswal Nasdaq 100 ETF AUM at ₹10,971 cr

Why the Motilal Oswal Nasdaq 100 ETF is trending

Posts on Reddit and other social platforms are circulating fresh screenshots of the Motilal Oswal Nasdaq 100 ETF’s NAV and fund size. The recurring point of discussion is the ETF’s stated AUM of about ₹10,971 crore and a NAV in the ₹271 to ₹273 band in early May 2026. Several users are also sharing basic transaction rules like minimum application and redemption amounts and the exit-load window. Another thread is about how to interpret different AUM figures that appear across platforms and scheme disclosures. The product is being discussed as an India-listed route to Nasdaq 100 exposure, with the benchmark described as NASDAQ 100 TR USD in scheme details. People are also citing the scheme’s long history, with inception shown as March 2011 in multiple extracts. The tone online is largely practical, focusing on costs, liquidity, and tracking the published data points. The conversations are not about quarterly earnings, but about product mechanics and reported numbers.

Snapshot: NAV, AUM, expense ratio and age

Multiple snippets in circulation quote the fund size at ₹10,971.46 crore, with an “as of” date around May 13, 2026. NAV values shared for May 11, 2026 cluster near ₹272.6405, while another data point lists NAV as ₹271.16 as of May 12, 2026. Expense ratio is repeatedly cited at 0.59% across posts and comparison tables. The fund is described as being in existence for about 15 years, with launch dates shown as 29-Mar-2011 and 16/03/2011 in different listings. Scheme pages also label it as an international equity oriented offering, with the objective of corresponding to the Nasdaq 100 Index performance, subject to tracking error. Some posts mention it as a “Global - Other” category fund, consistent with overseas index exposure. A scheme rating is shown as “Unrated” in one extract, which is being noted by users comparing options. A practical takeaway in the discussions is that the headline numbers are stable across sources: NAV in the high ₹260s to low ₹270s in May and AUM around ₹11,000 crore.

The AUM confusion: scheme-level vs plan-level numbers

One widely shared data extract lists a “latestAum” of 5987.3457 with “latestAumAsOnDt” as 2026-03-31 for a specific plan and option code (Direct Growth is referenced via plancode GD and optioncode G). At the same time, portfolio disclosures “as of 31st March 2026” show equity assets of ₹10,962.53 crore and others of ₹8.93 crore, which together align with a fund size close to ₹10,971 crore. This mismatch is driving questions about whether certain figures represent a plan-level AUM rather than the total scheme AUM. Users are also posting third-party snapshots showing AUM near ₹11,083.97 crore as of 01/03/2026 and around ₹11,230 crore near late March 2026. Because these numbers come with different timestamps and source formats, the discussion is less about a single “correct” figure and more about what each snapshot measures. The common anchor is that multiple references converge near ₹10,971 crore for the scheme around end-March to mid-May 2026. Investors are treating this as a reminder to check the “as on” date and whether the figure refers to the scheme, plan, or a platform’s tracked value. In short, the online debate is about interpretation, not about any announced flow figure.

Key transaction rules being shared: minimums and exit load

The most-circulated transaction detail is the minimum application amount: ₹500 and in multiples of ₹1 thereafter. The same set of details also lists redemption amount as ₹500 and in multiples of ₹1 thereafter, or the account balance, whichever is lower. Exit load is described as 1% if redeemed on or before 15 days from the date of allotment, and nil if redeemed after 15 days from the date of allotment. The posts also note that exit load applies to switch options among schemes of MOMF, while no load is imposed for switching between options within the same scheme. Another clarification being shared is that there is no exit load charged on a switch-out from Regular to Direct plan within the same scheme. Some platform pages also summarise exit load as “NIL,” which users reconcile with the disclosed rule by pointing out the nil load after the initial 15-day period. Separately, minimum SIP is referenced as starting from ₹100 in one snapshot, while another dataset focuses on the ₹500 purchase minimum. The practical outcome is that users are saving and reposting these rules as a quick checklist before buying or selling.

Timeline table: NAV and AUM points cited online

Below is a consolidated table of the dates and numbers that appear in the shared context. These are not extrapolated and are shown exactly as they are being posted across platforms. Readers are comparing these points to understand how the ETF’s displayed NAV and AUM change by date. Where multiple values exist, the “as of” date is the key piece that investors are being reminded to verify. This table is also being used to cross-check whether a screenshot is recent or older. It helps explain why two people can share different numbers while both are correct for their respective dates. The idea is not to pick a winner, but to preserve the audit trail of what was quoted. It also highlights that AUM is shown both as ₹10,971 crore and around ₹11,230 crore in late March snapshots. Here are the data points most frequently referenced.

What the ETF says it tracks and how benchmarks are shown

Scheme descriptions being shared say the investment objective is to seek returns corresponding to the Nasdaq 100 Index, subject to tracking error. The benchmark is repeatedly described as Nasdaq 100 Total Return, with one disclosure format naming it “NASDAQ 100 TR USD.” Another benchmark snippet shows “NASDAQ - 100 TRI (PRIMARY)” and also lists “Nifty 50 TRI (SECONDARY)” in the benchmark section as of 31 Mar 2026. The presence of a secondary benchmark is being noticed by users who are trying to interpret performance cards shown on apps. A separate benchmark line item in the context shows a Nifty 50 TRI figure of 33655.43 with a one-year return of about -3.9899% and a three-year return of about 10.0287% as of 31 Mar 2026. These benchmark numbers are not being used to claim relative outperformance in the discussions, but they are being quoted as part of the disclosure screenshots. Another data line in the context mentions “Scheme Inception Date - 29-09-2023” in a benchmark-related extract, which is being treated cautiously because the ETF’s inception is otherwise consistently shown as March 2011. The simplest interpretation circulating online is to treat March 2011 as the ETF’s start date while reading other inception fields as belonging to a specific dataset or disclosure module. The key point is that investors are using benchmark labels to confirm they are looking at a Nasdaq 100 tracking product.

Portfolio cues: equity exposure and a top holding reference

A portfolio summary “as of 31st March 2026” is being reposted to show how fully invested the fund is in equities. It lists equity at ₹10,962.53 crore or 99.92%, and “Others” at ₹8.93 crore or 0.08%. This near-full equity allocation is being used to set expectations on volatility, especially for investors comparing it to domestic index ETFs. Another frequently shared line says the top holding is NVIDIA Corporation (USA) at about 8.9% of assets. While the detailed holdings list is not in the shared context, this single holding statistic is driving some discussion around concentration risk within a tech-heavy index. The risk label “Very High” is also mentioned in the context based on SEBI’s risk classification approach, and users are repeating that tag in comments. People are also noting that the scheme is positioned for investors with a recommended horizon of more than three years in the shared Q&A style excerpts. Taken together, the portfolio snippets are being treated as a reminder that this is an equity product with meaningful single-stock weights via the index. None of these points are framed as a guarantee of returns, but as context for what the ETF actually holds.

Costs, manager details, and other scheme metadata

The expense ratio of 0.59% is one of the most repeated numbers, likely because it is easy to compare across similar products. One extract explicitly calls out an ISIN (INF247L01AP3) alongside the expense ratio and the benchmark label. Another snippet attributes fund management to Swapnil P Mayekar, with “since Oct 13, 2025” noted in the shared context. Investors are also noting that the scheme is open-ended, which matters for those deciding between ETF trading and fund-house transactions. A platform description in the context links the product to Motilal Oswal Asset Management Company Limited and includes the AMC’s contact and total AUM number, though online discussions are primarily focused on the ETF itself. There is also a promoter-investment line quoted as “~71772 Cr” as on 31 January 2024, which some users interpret as an alignment signal, while others treat it as a generic corporate disclosure. Scheme pages also highlight that redemption can be done via the AMC website or an investment platform, which is being shared among first-time ETF buyers. In the background, users are comparing direct and regular plan references, but the most actionable points remain expense ratio, exit load window, and the published NAV. The overall conversation is about verifying the scheme’s key facts before investing.

What investors are taking away from the May 2026 data points

The simplest takeaway from the posts is that the Motilal Oswal Nasdaq 100 ETF has an actively tracked public footprint, with frequent NAV and AUM snapshots. The NAV prints around May 11-12, 2026 are being used as a quick market proxy for the underlying Nasdaq 100 movement, even though the ETF is India-listed. The AUM number near ₹10,971 crore is being cited as a sign of meaningful scale, although the context does not provide a dedicated flow figure. The plan-level AUM figure of 5987.3457 as on 31 Mar 2026 is prompting investors to double-check whether they are comparing like-for-like numbers. The exit load nuance is another learning: 1% applies only within 15 days from allotment, with nil after 15 days, and platform summaries that say “NIL” may not always show the full condition. The portfolio allocation and top holding reference are being used to remind new investors that this is a concentrated tech-heavy index exposure. Finally, the repeated expense ratio of 0.59% makes it easy for investors to incorporate costs into return expectations, without assuming anything beyond what is disclosed. In short, the trend is driven by data-checking and product clarity rather than any new corporate event.