Sika Interplant Systems Ltd Q2 Profit Falls 3.7% to ₹8.61 Crore
Key highlights
- SIKA reported Q2 FY27 consolidated total income of ₹47.61 crore, down 10.3% year on year.
- SIKA's Q2 FY27 consolidated net profit was ₹8.61 crore, down 3.7% year on year and up 2.4% sequentially.
- SIKA reported Q2 FY27 basic EPS of ₹4.08, compared with ₹4.22 in Q2 FY26.
- SIKA paid dividends of ₹7.42 crore during the six months ended 30 September 2026, according to its standalone cash flow statement.
powered by IRIS

Sika Interplant Systems Ltd reported Q2 FY27 consolidated net profit of ₹8.61 crore, down 3.7% year on year. Total income for the quarter ended 30 September 2026 declined 10.3% to ₹47.61 crore, with supply-chain disruptions delaying the execution and delivery of certain customer orders.
Know Sika Interplant Systems inside out
Results, valuation, peers and who's buying, in one view.
What did SIKA report for Q2 FY27?
SIKA reported consolidated total income of ₹47.61 crore and net profit of ₹8.61 crore for the July-September 2026 quarter. The results were approved by the board and disclosed in a filing dated 14 November 2026. Basic earnings per share stood at ₹4.08, compared with ₹4.22 in the corresponding quarter a year earlier.
On a sequential basis, the quarterly performance improved. Consolidated total income rose 4.9% from ₹45.37 crore in Q1 FY27, while net profit increased 2.4% from ₹8.40 crore. Revenue from operations was ₹46.4 crore, down 10.1% year on year but higher than ₹42.9 crore in the preceding quarter. Other income was ₹1.2 crore during the period.
Why did SIKA's income decline year on year?
SIKA said continued external supply-chain disruptions materially affected the quarter by delaying the execution and delivery of certain customer orders. These delays deferred revenue that otherwise may have been recognised during the reporting period, contributing to the 10.3% year-on-year decline in consolidated total income.
The company said it had taken measures to mitigate the disruptions and expected execution and delivery to recover in upcoming periods. The filing did not quantify the value of delayed orders or provide a specific timeline for normalisation. Therefore, the reported numbers establish the near-term operational effect but do not indicate the extent of any subsequent revenue recovery.
The decline in profit was narrower than the fall in total income. Consolidated profit before exceptional items and tax was ₹11.5 crore, compared with ₹11.7 crore a year earlier, while the reported operating margin was 24.2%, against 22.0% in Q2 FY26. Finance costs of ₹0.04 crore were also 66.7% lower year on year.
How did the standalone business perform in Q2 FY27?
SIKA's standalone total income was ₹47.60 crore in Q2 FY27, down 10.2% from the year-earlier quarter and up 4.9% sequentially. Standalone net profit was ₹8.56 crore, a 2.5% year-on-year decline, and standalone basic earnings per share were ₹4.04.
Standalone profit before tax was ₹11.42 crore, down 2.6% year on year. Tax expense was ₹2.86 crore, equivalent to 25.1% of profit before tax. The close alignment between standalone and consolidated income and profit figures indicates that subsidiaries had a limited numerical effect on the reported consolidated result for this quarter.
The standalone cash flow statement also recorded dividend payments of ₹7.42 crore during the six months ended 30 September 2026. This is a cash-flow disclosure for the half year rather than a Q2 expense, but it is relevant for investors assessing the use of cash alongside the quarterly earnings result.
Got a follow-up? Ask IRIS
What did SIKA's board and auditors disclose?
SIKA's board approved the unaudited standalone and consolidated financial results for Q2 FY27 and authorised management to advance discussions on selected strategic acquisition opportunities. The disclosure referred to strategic opportunities but did not identify acquisition targets, expected transaction values, financing arrangements, or a timetable for any deal.
The auditors issued unmodified limited-review conclusions on the financial statements. The filing also noted that the results of four subsidiaries had not been reviewed by their respective auditors. This disclosure forms part of the basis on which the consolidated figures were reviewed and should be considered alongside the unmodified conclusion.
The board's acquisition authorisation comes as SIKA manages operational delays in its engineering products and systems business. The available filing does not link a potential acquisition to the supply-chain issue or state that an acquisition is necessary to address delayed delivery or revenue recognition.
What do the results mean for SIKA investors and operations?
SIKA's Q2 numbers show sequential improvement after Q1 FY27, when sales were ₹42.86 crore and net profit was ₹8.40 crore. However, income and profit remained below the year-earlier comparison base, making the delayed order execution identified by management a key operational factor behind the quarterly result.
For investors, the difference between the 10.3% decline in total income and the 3.7% decline in net profit is notable. The reported operating margin of 24.2% was higher than 22.0% a year earlier, while finance costs were lower. These figures indicate that profit held up better than income in the quarter, though they do not remove the importance of the deferred-revenue issue.
For customers and operations, delayed execution and delivery can shift the timing of project completion and revenue recognition. SIKA has said it is taking mitigation steps, but the filing does not provide order-book data, order cancellation data, or customer-specific details. Any assessment of recovery will therefore depend on subsequent disclosures and actual reported execution.
Conclusion
SIKA reported a mixed Q2 FY27 performance: consolidated total income fell 10.3% year on year to ₹47.61 crore, while net profit declined by a smaller 3.7% to ₹8.61 crore. Sequential income and profit growth, a higher reported operating margin, and lower finance costs supported the quarter, but supply-chain disruptions remained the central constraint on delivery and revenue recognition.
The next points to watch are whether the mitigation measures lead to improved execution and delivery, the pace at which deferred orders are reflected in reported income, and any further disclosure on the board-authorised strategic acquisition discussions. SIKA has indicated an expectation of recovery in upcoming periods but has not provided a specific target or timeline.


