Wealth First seeks Rs 60 crore subsidiary transaction mandate
Key highlights
- Wealth First is seeking shareholder approval for a one-year related-party transaction ceiling of Rs 60 crore with Lakshya Asset Management.
- The proposed Rs 60 crore mandate equals 84.40% of Wealth First’s preceding annual consolidated turnover.
- Wealth First owns 69.70% of Lakshya Asset Management’s equity share capital, voting power and beneficial interest.
- Wealth First disclosed a Rs 41 crore equity subscription in Lakshya Asset Management last financial year, a Rs 5 crore mutual fund investment in the current financial year and Rs 3,277 in brokerage income.
powered by IRIS

Wealth First Portfolio Managers Limited is seeking shareholder approval for up to Rs 60 crore of related-party transactions with subsidiary Lakshya Asset Management Private Limited for one year. The proposed ceiling equals 84.40% of Wealth First’s preceding annual consolidated turnover, making the aggregate arrangement a material related-party transaction under the disclosed listing-rule threshold.
Know Wealth First Portfolio Managers inside out
Results, valuation, peers and who's buying, in one view.
What approval is Wealth First seeking from shareholders?
Wealth First is seeking an omnibus approval and ratification for transactions of up to Rs 60 crore with Lakshya Asset Management, its subsidiary. The mandate covers sale, purchase, loans, contracts, arrangements, investments, transactions and transfers of resources, as well as brokerage or distribution income receivable by Wealth First. It would run for one year from the date shareholders pass the resolution.
The proposal follows approval of related-party transactions with Lakshya Asset Management at Wealth First’s 23rd annual general meeting on 5 September 2025. That earlier authority allowed material contracts, arrangements and transactions in the ordinary course of business and on an arm’s-length basis. Wealth First now states that it proposes to obtain ratification of those transactions alongside approval for the disclosed Rs 60 crore transaction framework.
The company’s stated materiality test comes from Regulation 23 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations, 2015. Under the disclosure, shareholder approval is required when related-party transactions, individually or together with earlier transactions in a financial year, exceed the lower of Rs 1,000 crore or 10% of annual consolidated turnover in the last audited financial statements. Wealth First says the proposed arrangements meet the material-related-party-transaction test.
Why is the Lakshya Asset Management mandate material?
The Rs 60 crore ceiling is material because it represents 84.40% of Wealth First’s annual consolidated turnover for the immediately preceding financial year. The company has marked “Yes” to whether the proposed transactions, together with transactions already undertaken with Lakshya Asset Management in the current financial year, would render the arrangement a material related-party transaction.
The proposed ceiling is above the amounts disclosed for earlier activity with Lakshya Asset Management. In the last financial year, Wealth First invested approximately Rs 41 crore to subscribe to 76,66,666 equity shares of the subsidiary. In the current financial year up to the date approval was sought, it disclosed a Rs 5 crore investment in a Lakshya Asset Management mutual fund scheme and brokerage income of Rs 3,277 received from the subsidiary.
The comparison shows the proposed one-year envelope is Rs 19 crore higher than the approximately Rs 41 crore equity subscription reported for the last financial year. The mandate is not limited to investments, however. It also includes purchases, sales, loans, contractual arrangements and resource transfers, so the filing does not provide a financial-year allocation among the individual categories within the Rs 60 crore maximum.
Got a follow-up? Ask IRIS
What is Wealth First’s relationship with Lakshya Asset Management?
Wealth First holds 69.70% of Lakshya Asset Management’s equity share capital, voting power and beneficial interest. Lakshya Asset Management is incorporated in India under the Companies Act, 2013, and is described in the notice as a subsidiary company. That ownership connection is the basis for classifying the proposed dealings as related-party transactions.
Lakshya Asset Management had not commenced business activities during the immediately preceding financial year, according to the filing. Its reported turnover for that period was zero, while its loss after tax was Rs 1.485892 crore and its net worth was Rs 59.514108 crore. Since it had not begun business in that year, Wealth First states that a comparison of the proposed amount with the related party’s annual consolidated or standalone turnover is not applicable.
The subsidiary’s disclosed position contrasts with the current-year Rs 5 crore mutual fund scheme investment and the broader Rs 60 crore request. The notice does not identify the underlying scheme, expected purchase and sale volumes, loan amount, or the value assigned to each transaction type. It instead asks shareholders to approve an aggregate ceiling covering the listed forms of dealings over one year.
What controls and interests does Wealth First disclose?
Wealth First says all proposed transactions will be in its ordinary course of business and conducted at arm’s length. Management says the arrangements will be subject to internal controls, approval processes and governance mechanisms, including review and oversight by the Audit Committee and Board. The filing says the Audit Committee and Board have recommended the resolution for member consideration and approval.
The notice identifies Ashish Shah, Wealth First’s Managing Director, as a common director in Wealth First and Lakshya Asset Management. It records his shareholding in the related party as not applicable. Apart from the interest mentioned, Wealth First says no other directors, key managerial personnel or their relatives are concerned or interested in the resolution, and says valuation or external-party reports are not applicable to this proposal.
The filing also states that related parties of Wealth First cannot vote on the resolution under the Listing Regulations, whether or not they are parties to the transactions. It lists interest rate, maturity date, repayment schedule, security, use of funds, credit rating and default disclosures as not applicable. This reflects that the proposed mandate is a mixed transaction authority rather than a defined borrowing or lending arrangement with specified terms.
Conclusion
The shareholder request would give Wealth First a one-year authority for up to Rs 60 crore of dealings with Lakshya Asset Management, a subsidiary in which it holds 69.70%. Its 84.40% relationship to Wealth First’s preceding consolidated turnover is the central reason the company is seeking member approval. The broad scope, ranging from investments to loans and brokerage or distribution income, means the filing establishes a ceiling rather than fixed transaction commitments.
The next disclosed step is shareholder consideration of the resolution recommended by Wealth First’s Audit Committee and Board on 26 October 2026. If approved, the authority would remain available for one year from the resolution date. Subsequent disclosures may show how much of the Rs 60 crore ceiling is used across the permitted transaction categories, after Lakshya Asset Management reported zero turnover in the preceding financial year.


