Axel Polymers faces Rs 86.63 crore GST demand and penalties
Key highlights
- Axel Polymers disclosed Rs 31.57 crore of ITC demand and Rs 55.06 crore of penalties, totalling Rs 86.63 crore.
- The 5 November 2026 order concerns alleged ITC transactions during financial years 2021-22 to 2024-25.
- The Rs 55.06 crore penalty component exceeds the Rs 31.57 crore ITC demand by Rs 23.49 crore.
- Axel Polymers intends to pursue a Section 107 CGST Act appeal and a Gujarat High Court writ petition.
powered by IRIS

Axel Polymers Limited received a GST order dated 5 November 2026 directing it to pay Rs 86.63 crore, comprising Rs 31.57 crore of input tax credit demand and Rs 55.06 crore of penalties, over allegations covering financial years 2021-22 to 2024-25; it intends to challenge the findings.
Know Axel Polymers inside out
Results, valuation, peers and who's buying, in one view.
What does the Rs 86.63 crore GST order require?
The order requires Axel Polymers to pay Rs 31.57 crore of input tax credit (ITC) and Rs 55.06 crore of penalties, taking the disclosed components to Rs 86.63 crore. The Additional Commissioner, Central GST and Central Excise, Vadodara-II passed the order on 5 November 2026, according to Axel Polymers’ 6 November 2026 exchange filing.
The Rs 55.06 crore penalty component is larger than the Rs 31.57 crore ITC demand by Rs 23.49 crore. The disclosed order therefore consists of a tax-credit demand and a separate penalty amount, rather than a single Rs 86.63 crore ITC claim.
The order followed a show-cause notice dated 19 January 2026. Axel Polymers’ covering letter identifies the order as No. 29/VDR-II/ADC-RM/ADJ/Axel Polymers/GST/2026-27, while Annexure A identifies the 5 November 2026 order as No. GEXCOM/ADJN/GST/ADC/749/2026.
Axel Polymers reported receiving the direction on 5 November 2026 after office hours. Its filing was addressed to BSE Limited on 6 November 2026 under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements Regulations, 2015.
What transactions does the GST order allege?
The GST order alleges that Axel Polymers availed ITC without physical receipt of inward supplies of goods and passed on ITC without an actual supply of goods. The allegations cover four financial years, from 2021-22 through 2024-25.
The two elements specified in the filing concern the claimed receipt of inward goods and the supply underlying ITC passed onward. The disclosure does not give transaction-level values, supplier names, product categories or a year-by-year split of the Rs 31.57 crore ITC demand for the 2021-22 to 2024-25 period.
Axel Polymers has not accepted the allegations in the 5 November 2026 order. It said it does not agree with the findings and conclusions of the adjudicating authority, so the filing presents the alleged conduct as the authority’s case rather than as an admission by Axel Polymers.
The authority named in Annexure A is the Adjudicating Authority, Additional Commissioner, Central GST and Central Excise, Vadodara-II, at GST Bhavan, Subhanpura, Vadodara, Gujarat. The 19 January 2026 show-cause notice preceded the 5 November 2026 order by more than nine months.
Got a follow-up? Ask IRIS
How will Axel Polymers challenge the GST order?
Axel Polymers intends to challenge the 5 November 2026 order before the appropriate appellate authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, within the prescribed time limit. It said it is examining the legal and factual grounds available to it against the Rs 86.63 crore disclosed demand and penalties.
The filing does not state a date on which an appeal under Section 107 will be filed. It also does not disclose any payment, deposit, provision, stay order or expected date for a decision by the appellate authority as of the 6 November 2026 announcement.
Separately, Axel Polymers said it intends to approach the Gujarat High Court through a writ petition. The company said it believes it has appropriate legal grounds to contest the findings and demands confirmed in the 5 November 2026 order.
The announcement distinguishes between the intended appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act and the planned writ petition before the Gujarat High Court. It does not say that either proceeding had been filed by 6 November 2026, only that Axel Polymers intends to pursue both routes.
What is the reported financial and operational impact?
Axel Polymers said it does not anticipate an impact on its routine business operations at this stage, despite the Rs 86.63 crore order disclosed on 6 November 2026. It said the financial impact will be subject to the outcome of the legal proceedings.
The filing does not quantify a provision, cash outflow, revenue effect, production disruption or other operating impact arising from the Rs 31.57 crore ITC demand or the Rs 55.06 crore penalties. It also does not provide a potential final liability estimate while the planned legal challenges remain unresolved.
The largest component is the Rs 55.06 crore penalty, which represents more than the Rs 31.57 crore ITC demand. However, the announcement provides no revenue, profit, cash, asset, debt or net-worth figure against which to compare the Rs 86.63 crore disclosed total.
Axel Polymers said it will keep the stock exchange informed of material developments under applicable SEBI listing-disclosure requirements. That commitment applies as the company pursues its stated Section 107 appeal plan and its intended Gujarat High Court writ petition after the 5 November 2026 order.
Conclusion
The 5 November 2026 GST order places Rs 86.63 crore of disclosed demand and penalties before Axel Polymers, based on allegations involving ITC claimed without physical receipt of inward goods and ITC passed on without actual goods supply during 2021-22 to 2024-25. The penalty amount of Rs 55.06 crore exceeds the Rs 31.57 crore ITC demand, while Axel Polymers disputes the authority’s findings.
The next disclosed milestones are Axel Polymers’ intended appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act within the prescribed time limit and its planned writ petition before the Gujarat High Court. The company has said the financial effect depends on the legal proceedings and that it will update the stock exchange on material developments, while expecting no routine operational impact at this stage.


