BigBloc Construction Q2 Revenue Rises 23.1%, Loss Narrows
Key highlights
- BigBloc reported Q2 FY27 revenue from operations of ₹82.86 crore, up 23.1% from ₹67.32 crore in Q2 FY26.
- BigBloc’s consolidated Q2 FY27 net loss narrowed 12.76% to ₹2.75 crore from ₹3.15 crore.
- BigBloc reported H1 FY27 revenue of ₹162.01 crore, a 31% year-on-year increase.
- BigBloc stated consolidated capacity utilisation of 69% in Q2 FY27 and has approvals for a proposed Indore project.
powered by IRIS
BigBloc Construction Ltd reported revenue from operations of ₹82.86 crore in Q2 FY27, up 23.1% year-on-year, while its consolidated net loss narrowed to ₹2.75 crore from ₹3.15 crore in the year-earlier quarter. The results underline higher sales volumes but also continuing cost pressure on profitability.
Know BIGBLOC Construction inside out
Results, valuation, peers and who's buying, in one view.
What did BigBloc report for Q2 FY27?
BigBloc reported quarterly revenue from operations of ₹82.86 crore for the quarter ended September 30, 2026, compared with ₹67.32 crore in Q2 FY26. The increase came as the AAC block, brick and wall-panel manufacturer reported higher sales volumes and continued expansion of its market presence.
The company’s consolidated net loss reduced 12.76% to ₹2.75 crore from ₹3.15 crore a year earlier. The board approved the unaudited standalone and consolidated financial results on November 3, 2026. The related exchange filing recorded a standalone quarterly loss of ₹2.85 crore and a consolidated quarterly loss of ₹2.75 crore.
How did profitability and margins change during the quarter?
BigBloc’s reported profit measures improved in some disclosures, although the supplied Q2 material contains differing EBITDA figures that cannot be reconciled from the available information. The company’s results communication stated EBITDA of ₹3.33 crore, up 75.70% from ₹1.90 crore, and an EBITDA margin of 4.02%, compared with 2.82% a year earlier.
A separate Q2 results summary in the supplied material reported quarterly EBITDA of ₹20.13 crore, up 17.7% from ₹17.09 crore, with an operating margin of 23.7% against 21.6%. That summary also cited profit after tax of ₹1.27 crore, while the BSE filing details a consolidated loss of ₹2.75 crore. Since no Q2 earnings-call transcript was published, investors should rely on the filed standalone and consolidated statements and seek clarification on the differing EBITDA and profit measures.
The standalone filing indicates why profitability remained under pressure. Total income was ₹22.30 crore in Q2 FY27, below total expenses of ₹26.07 crore. The company attributed the loss environment to increased raw-material costs and supply challenges, while its finance chief also referred to rising input costs and geopolitical uncertainty.
What was BigBloc’s performance in the first half of FY27?
BigBloc reported stronger revenue and operating growth for the first half of FY27, with revenue reaching ₹162.01 crore, a 31% increase from the corresponding period a year earlier. The company said H1 EBITDA rose 201.4% to ₹9.61 crore.
Its H1 net loss narrowed to ₹3.47 crore from ₹8.11 crore in the previous year’s first half. The standalone filing separately reported a standalone loss of ₹4.50 crore for the six months ended September 30, 2026. These measures relate to different reporting bases, so the consolidated and standalone figures should not be treated as directly interchangeable.
The half-year figures show that sales growth and improved operating performance did not fully eliminate losses. That distinction matters for investors because higher utilisation, raw-material procurement and expense control will remain important in assessing whether revenue growth converts into sustained profitability.
Got a follow-up? Ask IRIS
Why are capacity utilisation and the Indore project important?
BigBloc’s reported consolidated capacity utilisation of 69% in Q2 FY27 indicates ongoing ramp-up across its expanded manufacturing platform. Its standalone utilisation was stated at about 50%, reflecting the difference between the company-only operations and the wider consolidated business.
The company operates annual AAC manufacturing capacity of 1.3 million cubic metres across plants at Kheda, Umargaon and Kapadvanj in Gujarat, and Wada in Maharashtra. Incorporated in 2015, BigBloc describes itself as one of India’s largest listed AAC block manufacturers, with products also including AAC bricks and wall panels.
BigBloc has secured approvals for a proposed greenfield project in Indore. The planned facility is intended to extend its manufacturing footprint into Central India, where the company sees demand opportunities for energy-efficient construction materials. The supplied information does not state the project’s investment amount, capacity, commissioning date or expected revenue contribution.
How do the results affect BigBloc investors and the AAC materials market?
The quarter presents a mixed picture for BigBloc investors: revenue rose at a double-digit pace and the consolidated loss narrowed, but the business remained loss-making and faced higher input costs. The differing EBITDA figures across the supplied materials are also a disclosure point requiring careful review of the underlying financial statements.
For customers and construction-sector participants, the reported capacity ramp-up and proposed Indore plant point to a wider potential supply footprint for AAC materials. However, the company has not provided verified guidance on pricing, volumes, margins or the timing of the Indore project, so the direct commercial effect remains unquantified.
Mohit Saboo, Director and CFO, said the company remained optimistic about H2 FY27, which is traditionally a stronger period for construction activity. That view is management commentary rather than earnings guidance. The company has not published a Q2 FY27 earnings-call transcript, limiting detail on its cost outlook and operational assumptions.
Conclusion
BigBloc’s Q2 FY27 results show revenue growth of 23.1% to ₹82.86 crore and a narrower consolidated loss of ₹2.75 crore. Higher sales and capacity utilisation supported the operating trend, but elevated costs kept the company in a loss position, while conflicting EBITDA measures in the supplied disclosures warrant attention.
The next developments to watch are the company’s H2 FY27 performance during the traditionally stronger construction period, progress on the approved Indore greenfield project, and any clarification in future filings on the reported EBITDA, margin and profit figures.


