Toyam Sports says SEBI impact cannot yet be quantified
Key highlights
- Toyam Sports said the financial impact of SEBI notices cannot be determined while the investigation continues.
- Reviewers said finance activities represented more than 50% of Toyam Sports' funds without an ECL assessment.
- Toyam Sports reported Rs 1.38 crore of total income, Rs 2.72 crore of expenditure and a Rs 1.34 crore net loss.
- Two subsidiaries recorded a combined loss of Rs 99.04 lakh for the quarter ended September 30, 2026.
powered by IRIS

Toyam Sports Limited said the financial impact of Securities and Exchange Board of India notices cannot yet be determined while its investigation continues, as the September 30, 2026 consolidated limited review also cited some frozen shares and finance activities representing more than 50% of funds. The reviewers issued a qualified conclusion on November 14, 2026.
Know Toyam Sports inside out
Results, valuation, peers and who's buying, in one view.
Why did Toyam Sports receive a qualified conclusion?
Toyam Sports received a qualified conclusion because the reviewers could not quantify the potential effects of several accounting, regulatory and compliance matters in its consolidated results for the quarter and half year ended September 30, 2026. The limited review was conducted under Standard on Review Engagements 2410 and provided moderate assurance, rather than the assurance available in a full audit.
The central accounting issue concerned Indian Accounting Standard 109, or Ind AS 109, on financial instruments. The reviewers said Toyam Sports had not provided for impairment of financial assets through the expected credit loss, or ECL, approach, which estimates the probability of loss over an asset’s life using past events, current conditions and forecasts. They said finance activities accounted for more than 50% of the company’s funds.
Because management had not provided or assessed the relevant financial assets, the reviewers said they could not assess or quantify the potential future effect of unrecognised impairment on the financial results. The review also identified indications of impairment in loans and advances given to various companies, apart from loans for which provisions had already been made.
Management said it did not consider an ECL provision or further impairment necessary because its internal assessment found the financial instruments secure and counterparties creditworthy. It said loans and advances identified as non-recoverable in the past had already been written off, but it did not provide a monetary estimate for the remaining audit-qualification effects.
What did Toyam Sports disclose about SEBI notices and frozen shares?
Toyam Sports disclosed that it received notices from the Securities and Exchange Board of India, or SEBI, during the quarter, while the reviewers noted that ED had also frozen some shares. The filing says the resulting effect, if any, on financial results was not ascertainable pending completion of the SEBI investigation.
The report’s wording refers to the financial results for the quarter and year ended March 31, 2026, even though the consolidated limited review itself covers the quarter and half year ended September 30, 2026. The filing does not state the number of SEBI notices, the number or value of shares frozen, the identity of affected holders, or the duration of any freeze.
The reviewers said management had not shared information on whether there were proceedings other than the SEBI proceedings in view of the frozen shares. On that basis, they said they could not express an opinion on the potential impact of those matters on Toyam Sports.
Management said Toyam Sports was fully cooperating with SEBI and had responded to the notices received. It also said that, to the best of its knowledge, there were no other ongoing proceedings related to the frozen shares apart from the SEBI matter, while reiterating that any financial impact could not be determined at that stage.
What other matters did Toyam Sports reviewers identify?
Toyam Sports reviewers also questioned whether Section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, could apply because the company had substantial investments, loans and advances outstanding at the balance-sheet date. Management had not supplied a detailed assessment of the principal-business criteria, so the reviewers could not determine whether registration was required or what effect it could have on the financial statements.
The review further addressed merchandising agreements. The reviewers said Toyam Sports had not deliberated on the economic benefits realisable under the agreements and they could not express an opinion if contracted benefits were not realised over the next 12 months. Management responded that the agreement counterparty had agreed to pay interest, which it described as the economic benefit from advances provided for merchandise.
Statutory liabilities were another unresolved matter. The reviewers said Toyam Sports had not complied with professional tax and tax deducted at source, or TDS, and had not provided sufficient information for them to comment on the related financial and legal implications. Management said a shortage of funds following losses in the LLC T20 Cricket League had prevented it from meeting TDS, professional-tax and other statutory obligations.
The qualification was labelled repetitive in the statement on impact of audit qualifications. That statement did not quantify an adjustment for the matters identified by the reviewers, meaning its reported financial figures remained the same before and after the stated adjustment.
Got a follow-up? Ask IRIS
What do the reported figures show for September 2026?
Toyam Sports reported total income of Rs 1.38 crore and total expenditure of Rs 2.72 crore in the statement on impact of audit qualifications for the quarter and half year ended September 30, 2026. Expenditure therefore exceeded income by Rs 1.34 crore, matching the reported net loss of Rs 1.34 crore.
The unchanged figures do not represent a resolution of the qualification. The filing specifically states that the auditors had not quantified the impact of the qualification, while management’s estimate in the annexure was that no loss provision was required based on its assessment of credit risk and recoverability.
The consolidated review also included two subsidiaries, Kumite 1 League Private Limited and Pacific Star Sports Services L.L.C. Their interim financial information, reviewed by other auditors, included a combined total loss of Rs 99.04 lakh, including other comprehensive income, for the quarter ended September 30, 2026. The principal reviewers said their conclusion was not modified in respect of those subsidiary review reports.
What should readers watch in the next Toyam Sports disclosure?
Toyam Sports’ next disclosures will need to show whether the SEBI investigation has concluded and whether management can then quantify any financial result impact. The current filing does not set a completion date, quantify possible exposure, or specify the shares affected by the reported freeze.
Readers can also watch for an ECL assessment under Ind AS 109, impairment analysis under Ind AS 36, and management’s assessment of whether Section 45-IA registration applies. These matters remain unquantified in the September 30, 2026 review and are directly linked to the qualified conclusion.
A further point is whether Toyam Sports supplies information on TDS and professional-tax compliance and demonstrates the contracted benefits from merchandising agreements over the next 12 months. Management has linked the statutory-payment shortfall to losses in the LLC T20 Cricket League, while the reviewers said they lacked information to evaluate the implications.
Conclusion
Toyam Sports’ September 2026 consolidated review combines an ongoing SEBI matter and reported frozen shares with unresolved questions over impairment, loans and advances, potential Reserve Bank registration, merchandising agreements and statutory liabilities. The company reported a net loss of Rs 1.34 crore in the qualification statement, but the reviewers could not quantify how the listed matters could affect the financial statements.
The next material development is the completion of the SEBI investigation, for which the filing gives no timetable. Investors should also watch for management’s planned or pending assessments of financial-asset impairment, Section 45-IA applicability, statutory liabilities and economic benefits under merchandising agreements during the stated next 12 months.


