Shristi Infrastructure Q2 FY27 net profit reaches ₹3.3 crore
Key highlights
- Shristi Infrastructure reported Q2 FY27 revenue from operations of ₹6.9 crore, down 57.1% year on year.
- The results summary reported Q2 FY27 net profit of ₹3.3 crore versus a ₹5.2 crore loss in Q2 FY26.
- Other income was ₹1.9 crore in Q2 FY27, compared with ₹0.1 crore in Q1 FY27.
- The filing extract cited quarterly finance-cost understatement of ₹6.48 crore and security cover of 2.12 times on 1,450 secured NCDs.
powered by IRIS

Shristi Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd reported a consolidated Q2 FY27 net profit of ₹3.3 crore, compared with a loss of ₹5.2 crore a year earlier, although revenue from operations fell 57.1% year on year to ₹6.9 crore. The result is significant because separate filing details also flag qualified audit findings and an understatement of finance costs.
Know Shristi Infrastructure Development Corporation inside out
Results, valuation, peers and who's buying, in one view.
What did Shristi Infrastructure report for Q2 FY27?
Shristi Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd, referred to as Shristi Infrastructure, reported consolidated revenue from operations of ₹6.9 crore for the quarter ended September 30, 2026. This was lower than ₹16.1 crore in Q2 FY26 and ₹8.1 crore in Q1 FY27. The company’s reported total income was ₹8.8 crore, including other income of ₹1.9 crore.
The results summary showed net profit of ₹3.3 crore for Q2 FY27, against losses of ₹14.6 crore in the preceding quarter and ₹5.2 crore in the corresponding quarter of the previous year. Profit before exceptional items and tax was reported at ₹5.4 crore, compared with a loss of ₹13.2 crore in Q1 FY27 and a loss of ₹3.3 crore in Q2 FY26.
The board approved unaudited standalone and consolidated financial results for the quarter and half year ended September 30, 2026. The announcement was reported on November 14, 2026, following a board meeting scheduled to consider the results.
Why did the reported profit improve despite lower revenue?
The reported quarterly profit improved despite lower revenue because the results summary showed a sharp recovery in profitability measures from the losses recorded in the prior periods. Operating margin was reported at 61.4%, compared with negative 163.0% in Q1 FY27 and negative 20.5% in Q2 FY26.
The same summary reported year-on-year operating-profit growth of 206.1% and quarter-on-quarter growth of 126.3%. It also states that operating profit excludes other income. Other income of ₹1.9 crore was materially higher than ₹0.1 crore in the preceding quarter and nil in Q2 FY26, and it contributed to total income for the quarter.
However, the available information does not provide a detailed expense-wise explanation for the movement from loss to profit. Revenue contraction remained substantial, with Q2 revenue of ₹6.9 crore also below the ₹8 crore sales reported for the June 2026 quarter in the company’s earlier quarterly data.
What audit issues were disclosed in the results filing?
The filing details included in the available material disclose a different set of figures and qualified audit findings. They state that the quarter recorded a net loss after tax of ₹1.42 crore and that the half-year loss was ₹21.02 crore, while quarterly revenue was ₹6.86 crore and half-year revenue was ₹37.13 crore.
The same disclosure says finance costs were understated by ₹6.48 crore for the quarter and by ₹12.90 crore for the half year. It also refers to qualified audit findings and material uncertainty relating to going concern. These disclosures are important because finance-cost recognition can materially affect reported losses, net worth and an assessment of financial obligations.
The supplied material does not reconcile the reported consolidated profit of ₹3.3 crore in the results summary with the separate filing extract citing a quarterly loss of ₹1.42 crore. Investors should therefore distinguish between the headline summary and the detailed unaudited financial statements, notes and audit observations before drawing conclusions from the quarterly profit figure.
Got a follow-up? Ask IRIS
How does Q2 FY27 compare with Shristi Infrastructure's recent performance?
Q2 FY27 revenue was below the company’s recent reported sales levels, continuing a weak revenue trend. Historical consolidated quarterly data in the available material shows sales of ₹21 crore in June 2025, ₹16 crore in September 2025, ₹17 crore in December 2025, ₹16 crore in March 2026 and ₹8 crore in June 2026.
Net profit in those earlier periods was volatile and largely negative. The company reported losses of ₹5 crore in June 2025, ₹5 crore in September 2025, ₹6 crore in December 2025, ₹9 crore in March 2026 and ₹15 crore in June 2026. Against that background, the Q2 FY27 reported profit represents a marked change in the headline quarterly result, but the qualified audit observations remain relevant to assessing it.
Shristi Infrastructure also disclosed a 2.12 times pari passu security cover on 1,450 secured non-convertible debentures as of September 30, 2026. The auditor confirmed that this was above the required 1.5 times. This debt-security metric is separate from quarterly profitability but is relevant to creditors and investors assessing the company’s financing position.
What does the result mean for investors and creditors?
For investors, the quarter presents two contrasting signals: the reported summary shows a return to profit and positive operating margin, while revenue declined sharply and the detailed disclosure identifies understatements of finance costs and going-concern uncertainty. The revenue decline of 57.1% year on year indicates that the reported profit did not come alongside growth in core operating revenue.
For creditors, the 2.12 times security cover on secured debentures is a disclosed positive compliance measure relative to the 1.5 times requirement. But the finance-cost understatement cited in the filing is a separate risk factor because it affects the reported cost of borrowings and the measurement of periodic losses.
The company’s customers and operating ecosystem are not directly discussed in the supplied results material. There is also no disclosed share-price movement, management commentary on business demand, or forward financial guidance in the information provided. As a result, the available data supports a review of reported figures and disclosure quality rather than a conclusion on future operating performance.
Conclusion
Shristi Infrastructure’s Q2 FY27 results summary reported net profit of ₹3.3 crore after losses in the preceding quarter and the year-earlier period, but revenue from operations fell to ₹6.9 crore. The result must be read alongside the detailed filing extract, which cites a quarterly loss of ₹1.42 crore, understated finance costs and qualified audit findings.
The next point to watch is whether subsequent financial disclosures reconcile the difference between the headline results summary and the detailed filing figures. Investors may also monitor revenue trends, treatment of finance costs, the stated going-concern uncertainty and continued compliance with the 1.5 times debenture security-cover requirement.


